Verified student reviews, peer standing, publications and the pipeline behind them, academic family trees and collaboration networks — a living wiki that students, colleagues, family and the scholars themselves keep up to date.
Reviews weighted by how credibly a student can prove they took the class
Ratings only tell you about one semester. YesRateProf connects the classroom to the lab, the lineage, the field and the community around it.
Verified student reviews, course by course, term by term.
Publications, citations, venues — and the papers still in review.
Advisors and academic children, generations up and down.
Co-authors, co-PIs and the institutions they connect.
Administration, editorial boards, talks, volunteering and honors.
Grants, industry partnerships, spin-outs and education partners.
Overlapping avatars, progress-as-background, an accordion row, a card tray, a magnifying dock and a pull-down summary — six small interactions run through every profile.
Open the example profileAnyone can say they took a class. We ask for proof — and weight every review by how much of it they gave.
Review weight by credibility level · Bayesian-smoothed averages
Coursework or grade — A graded assignment, grade report or course-site screenshot — checked privately, then deleted
Your words are yours. If you once reviewed a professor on another site, you can re-post that review here — keep the original term and date, then verify you took the class so it carries full weight.
Filter by discipline and watch the map light up — by headcount, influence, publications, or where students have actually left reviews.
PhD candidates and pre-tenure faculty ranked by momentum: citation growth, the papers in their pipeline, and what their peers expect next.
Stories from students, colleagues and family. Every fact carries its source, who added it and how many people confirmed it.
Growing up, Mom graded papers at the kitchen table every Sunday with a green pen because she thought red pen was 'too loud'. She would read the best answers out loud to us. I didn't understand access control, but I understood that she was proud of her students.
Every grant I've submitted since 2018 has Helen's comments on it, usually timestamped after 11pm. She is the person in the building everyone asks for a second read — and she never makes you feel bad about the first draft.
The night of the MIS 301 final, I waited until everyone had left to ask Professor Zhao whether it was too late to switch into the major. She sat on the edge of the stage with my transcript for forty minutes and mapped out every semester until graduation. I'm now a security engineer. I still have the sheet of paper.
My first paper was rejected with three brutal reviews. Helen asked me to write the reviewers a thank-you note — not to send, just to write. By the end of the note I knew exactly how to fix the paper. I now ask my own students to do the same.
Experience ↔ trajectory, Education ↔ advisors, Publications, Honors, Volunteering, Recommendations ↔ reviews & stories. Import your LinkedIn export, or copy any section back.